4.6 Article

Relationship between Kidney Function and Liver Histology in Subjects with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.05050610

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objectives: We assessed whether nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) diagnosed by liver biopsy is associated with decreased kidney function and whether such association is independent of insulin resistance and features of the metabolic syndrome. Design, settings, participants, & measurements: We enrolled 80 consecutive overweight patients with biopsy-proven NASH and 80 nonsteatotic control subjects who were matched for age, gender, and body mass index. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as the presence of estimated GFR (eGFR) of <= 60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) and/or abnormal albuminuria (i.e., urinary albumin/creatinine ratio >= 30 mg/g). Results: NASH patients had significantly (P < 0.001) lower eGFR (75.3 +/- 12 versus 87.5 +/- 6 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)) and a greater frequency of abnormal albuminuria (14 versus 2.5%) and CKD (25 versus 3.7%) than control subjects. The significant differences in eGFR, albuminuria, and CKD that were observed between the two groups were only slightly weakened after adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, smoking status, insulin resistance (by homeostasis model assessment), and components of the metabolic syndrome. Notably, histologic severity of NASH (i.e., fibrosis stage) was strongly associated with either decreasing eGFR or increasing albuminuria (P < 0.01 or less), independently of potential confounding factors. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients with biopsy-proven NASH have moderately decreased eGFR and a higher frequency of abnormal albuminuria and CKD than matched control subjects and that the severity of NASH histology is associated with decreased kidney function, independently of traditional risk factors, insulin resistance, and components of the metabolic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 2166-2171, 2010. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05050610

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据