4.6 Article

Renal phenotype in Lowe syndrome: A selective proximal tubular dysfunction

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00520108

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lowe Syndrome Trust
  2. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [V0901] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objectives: Lowe syndrome is defined by congenital cataracts, mental retardation, and proximal tubulopathy and is due to mutations in OCRL. Recently, mutations in OCRL were found to underlie some patients with Dent disease, characterized by low molecular weight proteinuria, hypercalciuria, and nephrocalcinosis. This phenotypic heterogeneity is poorly understood. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: The renal phenotype of 16 patients with Lowe syndrome (10.9 +/- 7.0 yr) under care of the authors was characterized to define overlap of symptoms with Dent disease and infer clues about OCRL function. Medical charts of patients were reviewed for data regarding glomerular filtration rate and markers of proximal tubular function. Results: All patients had low molecular weight proteinuria and albuminuria. Lysosomal enzymuria was elevated in all 11 patients assessed. Fifteen patients had hypercalciuria, and 14 aminoaciduria. Seven patients required bicarbonate and three required phosphate replacement; all others maintained normal serum values without supplementation. None of the patients had detectable glycosuria, and none had clinically overt rickets. GFR was mildly to moderately impaired and highly variable, with a trend of deterioration with age. Conclusions: Patients with Lowe syndrome do not have renal Fanconi syndrome but a selective proximal tubulopathy, variable in extent and dominated by low molecular weight proteinuria and hypercalciuria, the classical features of Dent disease. These findings suggest that OCRL and CIC-5, the chloride channel mutated in Dent disease, are involved in similar reabsorption pathways in the proximal tubule.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据