4.3 Article

The effects of neuromuscular training on knee joint motor control during sidecutting in female elite soccer and handball players

期刊

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 329-337

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31817f3e35

关键词

hamstrings; quadriceps; gluteus medius; prevention; ACL; test-retest; prophylactic intervention; surface EMG; CMJ; dynamic valgus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The project aimed to implement neuromuscular training during a full soccer and handball league season and to experimentally analyze the neuromuscular adaptation mechanisms elicited by this' training during a standardized sidecutting maneuver known to be associated with non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Design: The players were tested before and after I season without implementation of the prophylactic training and subsequently before and after a full season with the implementation of prophylactic training. Participants: A total of 12 female elite soccer players and 8 female elite team handball players aged 26 3 years at the start of the study. Intervention: The subjects participated in a specific neuromuscular training program previously shown to reduce non-contact ACL injury. Methods: Neuromuscular activity at the knee joint, joint angles at the hip and knee, and ground reaction forces were recorded during a sidecutting maneuver. Neuromuscular activity in the prelanding phase was obtained 10 and 50 ms before foot strike on a force plate and at 10 and 50 ms after foot strike on a force plate. Results: Neurornuscular training markedly increased prelanding activity and landing activity electromyography (EMG) of the semitendinosus (P < 0.05), while quadriceps EMG activity remained unchanged. Conclusions: Neuromuscular training increased EMG activity for the medial hamstring muscles, thereby decreasing the risk of dynamic valgus. This observed neuromuscular adaptation during sidecutfing could potentially reduce the risk for non-contact ACL injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据