4.7 Article

Relapse Versus Reinfection: Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection Following Treatment With Fidaxomicin or Vancomycin

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 S104-S109

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis357

关键词

-

资金

  1. Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc., under the National Institutes of Health [R44 AI063692]
  2. US Department of Veterans Affairs Research Service
  3. Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  4. GOJO
  5. Merck
  6. Optimer
  7. Sanofi Pasteur
  8. Eurofins Medinet
  9. ViroPharma
  10. Merck Co
  11. Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals
  12. Optimer Pharmaceuticals
  13. Theravance
  14. Cubist
  15. Pfizer
  16. Astellas
  17. Cerexa
  18. Impex Pharmaceuticals
  19. Novexel
  20. Novartis
  21. Clinical Microbiology Institute
  22. Genzyme
  23. Nanopacific Holdings
  24. Romark Laboratories LC
  25. Viroxis
  26. Warner Chilcott
  27. Avidbiotics
  28. GLSynthesis
  29. Immunome
  30. Toltec Pharma LLC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our study sought to compare the strain types of Clostridium difficile causing initial and recurrent episodes of C. difficile infection (CDI) in adult patients with a first episode of CDI or 1 prior episode of CDI within the previous 90 days. Strains originated from patients who had been entered into two phase 3 randomized clinical trials of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin. Isolates of C. difficile from the initial and recurrent episodes within 28 (+/-2) days of cure of CDI were compared using restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) typing. Paired isolates were available from 90 of 194 (46%) patients with recurrent CM. Patients with isolates available were significantly younger (P = .008) and more likely to be from Canadian sites (P = .0001), compared with patients without isolates. In 75 of 90 subjects (83.3%), the identical REA type strain was identified at recurrence and the initial episode (putative relapse). Early recurrences (0-14 days after treatment completion) were relapses in 86.7% and a new strain (reinfection) in 13.3%. Later recurrences (15-31 days after treatment) were relapses in 76.7% and reinfections in 23.3%. Mean time (+/- standard deviation) to recurrence was 12.2 (+/-6.4) days for relapses and 14.7 (+/-6.8) days for reinfections (P = .177). The most common BI/NAP1/027 group and the previous US epidemic REA group J/NAP2/001 had a significantly higher combined rate of recurrence with the same strain (relapse), compared with the other REA groups (39 of 42 [93%] vs 36 of 48 [75%], respectively; P = .023). We found a higher than historic rate of recurrent CDI caused by the same isolate as the original episode, a finding that may be related to the relatively short observation period in this study and the high frequency of isolation of epidemic strains, such as groups BI and J, for which relapse rates may be higher than for other REA groups. Caution in generalizing these observations is required, because the patients studied were younger and more likely to be from Canadian sites than were patients with recurrence who did not provide isolates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据