4.7 Review

Progress on Developing Endpoints for Registrational Clinical Trials of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Update From the Biomarkers Consortium of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 55, 期 8, 页码 1114-1121

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis566

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [HHSN261200800001E]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
  3. Actelion Pharmaceuticals
  4. Basilea Pharmaceutica International
  5. Cempra Pharmaceuticals
  6. Cerexa
  7. Actelion
  8. Basilea
  9. Bayer
  10. Cempra
  11. Durata
  12. Cubist-Calixa
  13. FAB Pharma
  14. JJ
  15. Kalidex
  16. Meiji
  17. Merada
  18. Merck
  19. Nabriva
  20. Wyeth/Pfizer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficacy endpoints for previous registrational trials of antimicrobials for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) were based on nonstandardized, clinician-based observations and decisions, as well as on patient reports. More quantifiable, reproducible, and externally verifiable endpoints could improve the design of future noninferiority trials. At the request of the Food and Drug Administration, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health convened a broadly representative scientific project team to evaluate potential endpoints for such registrational trials. Review of historical and modern data led to the conclusion that antimicrobial treatment effects are most apparent early in therapy; later outcomes provide important supportive information. Although evidence is incomplete, early response endpoints can anchor noninferiority hypotheses in ABSSSI and CABP registrational trials, thereby allowing evidence-based drug development to continue. Further research is underway to establish which short- and long-term outcomes are well-defined, reliable, and reflective of how patients feel, function, or survive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据