4.7 Article

Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes in Patients Receiving Treatment for Mycobacterium abscessus Pulmonary Disease

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 565-571

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciq237

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Mycobacterium abscessus can produce a chronic pulmonary infection for which little is known regarding optimal treatment and long-term outcomes. Methods. We performed a retrospective observational study (2001-2008) including all patients who met American Thoracic Society criteria for M. abscessus pulmonary disease. Our aim was the evaluation of clinical and microbiologic outcomes in patients treated with combined antibiotic and surgical therapy, compared with antibiotic therapy alone. Results. A total of 107 patients were included in the analysis. Patients were predominantly female (83%) and never-smokers (60%), with a mean age of 60 years. Fifty-nine (55%) of 107 patients had coexistent or previous history of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary infection. High-resolution chest CT showed bronchiectasis and nodular opacities in 98% of patients and cavities in 44%. Sixy-nine (46 medical, 23 surgical) patients were followed up for a mean duration of 34 months (standard deviation, 21.1 months, range, 2-82 months). Cough, sputum production, and fatigue remained stable, improved, or resolved in 80%, 69%, and 59% of patients, respectively. Twenty (29%) of 69 patients remained culture positive, 16 (23%) converted but experienced relapse, 33 (48%) converted to negative and did not experience relapse, and 17 (16%) died during the study period. There were significantly more surgical patients than medical patients whose culture converted and remained negative for at least 1 year (57% vs 28%; P = .022). Conclusions. Patients with M. abscessus pulmonary disease who are treated with multidrug antibiotic therapy and surgery or antibiotic therapy alone had similar clinical outcomes. However, surgical resection, in addition to antibiotics, may offer a prolonged microbiologic response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据