4.7 Article

Epidemic of Group A Streptococcus M/emm59 Causing Invasive Disease in Canada

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 51, 期 11, 页码 1290-1297

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/657068

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Microbiology Laboratory, Winnipeg, Manitoba
  2. Alberta Health Services, Alberta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The incidence of invasive group A Streptococcus ( GAS) disease can vary over time and geographic region, possibly reflecting the population's susceptibility to particular strains but also variation in the predominant M/emm types. Canadian surveillance documented an epidemic of an uncommon M/emm59 type from 2006 to 2009. Methods. Invasive GAS isolates are submitted by Public Health Laboratories in Canada to the National Centre for Streptococcus for M/emm typing. Patient age, sex, geographic location, and the anatomical source of isolate are provided with the isolate. When it was recognized that M/emm59 strains were increasing in prevalence, clinical information was collected on M/emm59 cases captured in Alberta and compared with cases of other M/emm types occurring in this province. Results. From January 2006 through December 2009, 539 (13.0%) of 4150 invasive GAS cases were identified as M/emm59: 164 from British Columbia, 146 from Alberta, 62 from Saskatchewan, 82 from Manitoba, 68 from Ontario, 14 from Quebec, 1 from New Brunswick, 1 from Newfoundland, 1 from Yukon, and 1 from Nunavut. The predominant clinical presentation was bacteremia (45.0%) followed by cellulitis (41.4%). Compared with concurrent cases of invasive GAS disease caused by all other M/emm types, identified risk factors for M/emm59 disease were alcohol abuse (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.8), homelessness (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4), hepatitis C virus infection (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5), and illicit drug use (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-3.0). Conclusions. Western Canada has witnessed the rapid emergence of a rare GAS strain causing invasive disease predominately in a select population of disadvantaged persons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据