4.7 Article

Surrogate Markers and Microbiologic End Points

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 S126-S130

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/653061

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pfizer
  2. Wyeth
  3. Novartis
  4. US Food and Drug Administration
  5. Infectious Diseases Society of America
  6. American College of Chest Physicians
  7. American Thoracic Society
  8. Society of Critical Care Medicine
  9. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals
  11. Forest Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For treatment studies of an infectious disease, such as pneumonia, microbiologic eradication is the logical primary end point. Several problems for pneumonia in general and several more specific to VAP preclude the use of microbiologic eradication as a primary end point. These problems include no positive culture result at baseline, difficulty distinguishing colonization from infection on baseline cultures, no specimen available for testing when determining cure, and induction of colonization by antibiotic treatment. These problems have led to interest in serial quantitative cultures and biomarkers to determine the microbiologic outcome. Although promising, especially for open-label studies focused on multidrug-resistant pathogens, further research is needed before serial quantitative cultures can be used to define microbiologic failure. Of the biomarkers, procalcitonin level may be a valuable adjunct to clinical evaluation but cannot be a primary end point alone. A decreasing or low procalcitonin level after initiation of antibiotic treatment correlates well with bacterial eradication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据