4.7 Article

Duration and Clearance of Anal Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection among Women: The Hawaii HPV Cohort Study

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 536-546

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/596758

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01-CA-077318]
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. Department of Health and Human Services
  4. Merck
  5. GlaxoSmithKline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The association of anal cancer with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is well established; however, little is known about the epidemiology of anal HPV in healthy women. We investigated patterns of duration and clearance of anal HPV infection in a cohort of healthy women in Hawaii. Methods. Viral and nonviral determinants of anal HPV clearance were examined in a longitudinal cohort study of 431 sexually active women. At baseline and at 4-month intervals, interviews were conducted and cervical and anal cell specimens were obtained for detection of HPV DNA. Results. Of the 431 women, 50% experienced a total of 414 incident anal HPV infections, reported at >= 1 clinic visits from baseline through a follow-up period of average duration of 1.2 years. Of these infections, 58% cleared during follow-up. The clearance rate for a high-risk anal infection was 9.2 per 100 woman-months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.9-11.9 per 100 woman-months), with a median duration of 150 days (95% CI, 132 243 days). The slowest clearing high-risk HPV types were HPV-59 (median clearance time, 350 days) and HPV-58 (median clearance time, 252 days). The median clearance times for HPV-16 and HPV-18, the predominant types associated with anal cancer, were 132 days and 212 days, respectively. Nonviral factors that delayed clearance of anal HPV included douching, long-term tobacco smoking, and anal sex. Conclusions. The majority of anal HPV infections resolve in a relatively short time. Although anal HPV is commonly acquired in healthy women, its rapid clearance suggests limited efficacy of HPV testing as an anal cancer screening tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据