4.7 Article

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the prime-boost strategy for pneumococcal vaccination in adult liver transplant recipients

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 47, 期 7, 页码 885-892

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/591537

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [150921]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) is recommended for disease prevention in solid-organ transplant recipients, but it may have suboptimal immunogenicity. It may be possible to enhance immunogenicity by priming the recipient with the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7), followed by boosting with PPV23. Methods. We randomized adult liver transplant recipients to receive either (1) PCV7 followed by a PPV23 booster 8 weeks later (the primed group) or (2) placebo followed by a standard single dose of PPV23 (the unprimed group). Quantitative and functional antibody titers for 7 serotypes contained in both vaccines were measured at baseline, 8 weeks after enrollment, and 16 weeks after enrollment. Of 130 randomized patients, 113 completed the study. Results. At week 16, response to at least 1 serotype was seen in 48 (85.7%) of 56 and 52 (91.2%) of 57 patients for the primed and unprimed groups, respectively (P = not significant). The mean number of serotypes to have responded (+/- SD) was 3.7 +/- 2.3 and 4.4 +/- 2.2 for the primed and unprimed groups, respectively (P = not significant). Functional antibody titers, which were measured with use of the opsonophagocytic assay, were also similar in both groups. Conclusions. The immunogenicity of pneumococcal vaccination was not enhanced by the prime-boost strategy, compared with vaccination with PPV23 alone. Administration of a single dose of PPV23 should continue to be the standard of care for adult liver transplant recipients. Clinical trials registration. NCT00152802 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据