4.7 Article

Nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Gambian infants:: A longitudinal study

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 807-814

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/528688

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. To prepare for national introduction of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine of restricted valency, we studied nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Gambian infants. Methods. We studied 236 infants in 21 villages. We collected nasopharyngeal swab samples at birth, twice per month for 6 months, and every second month until 1 year of age. We studied time to acquisition and duration of pneumococcal carriage according to serotype. Results. All infants carried S. pneumoniae at some point. Sixty-five serotypes were found, and the 5 most common serotypes (6B, 19F, 6A, 14, and 23F) accounted for 51% of isolates. The mean age at first acquisition of carriage was 33 days (95% confidence interval, 29 -36 days). There were no significant differences in acquisition rates between the 6 most common serotypes (P = .067) or between vaccine serotypes, vaccine-related serotypes, or nonvaccine serotypes (P = .317). However, the duration of carriage differed significantly between the 6 most common serotypes (P = .004). The rate of reacquisition of carriage and the duration of carriage did not differ significantly between the 6 most common serotypes (P = .229 and P = .699 respectively). However, nonvaccine types were acquired faster (P = .004) and were carried for a shorter duration (P < .001) than were vaccine serotypes. A previous episode of serotype 14 carriage was associated with delayed reacquisition of this serotype (P = .005) and longer duration of carriage (P = .017). Conclusions. The data provided in this study regarding time to acquisition and duration of pneumococcal carriage in Gambian infants provide an important baseline for evaluating the impact of the introduction of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in The Gambia and elsewhere in Africa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据