4.4 Article

Zirconia in Fixed Implant Prosthodontics

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00317.x

关键词

CAD; CAM; prosthetic design; zirconia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: CAD/CAM technology in combination with zirconia ceramic has increasingly gained popularity in implant dentistry. Purpose: This narrative review presents the current knowledge on zirconia utilized as framework material for implant-borne restorations and implant abutments, laboratory tests and developments, clinical performance, and possible future trends for implant dentistry are addressed. Material and Methods: A review of available literature from 1990 through 2010 was conducted with search terms zirconia,implants,abutment,crown, and fixed dental prosthesis using electronic databases (PubMed) and manual searching. Results: Latest applications of zirconia in implant dentistry include implant abutments, multiple unit and full-arch frameworks as well as custom-made bars to support fixed and removable prostheses. High biocompatibility, low bacterial surface adhesion as well as favorable chemical properties of zirconia ceramics are reported. Zirconia stabilized with yttrium oxide exhibits high flexural strength and fracture toughness due to a transformation toughening mechanism. Preliminary clinical data confirmed the high stability of zirconia for abutments and as a framework material for implant borne crowns and fixed dental prostheses. Zirconia abutment or framework damage has rarely been encountered. However, veneering porcelain fractures are the most common technical complication in implant-supported zirconia restorations. These porcelain veneer failures have led to concerns regarding differences in coefficient of thermal expansions between core and veneering porcelain and their respective processing techniques. Conclusion: As presently evidence of clinical long-term data is missing, caution with regard to especially extensive implant-borne zirconia frameworks is recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据