4.4 Article

Bone Response to Free-Form Fabricated Hydroxyapatite and Zirconia Scaffolds: A Transmission Electron Microscopy Study in the Human Maxilla

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00270.x

关键词

FIB; free-form fabrication; hydroxyapatite; scaffolds; TEM; zirconia

资金

  1. VINNOVA
  2. Biomedical Development in Western Sweden
  3. Institute for Biomaterials and Cell Therapy
  4. Swedish Research Council [K2006-73X-09495-16-3]
  5. Hjalmar Svensson Foundation
  6. Canadian Centre for Electron Microscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Understanding the interfacial reactions to synthetic bone regenerative scaffolds in vivo is fundamental for improving osseointegration and osteogenesis. Using transmission electron microscopy, it is possible to study the biological response of hydroxyapatite (HA) and zirconia (ZrO2) scaffolds at the nanometer scale. Purpose: In this study, the bone-bonding abilities of HA and ZrO2 scaffolds produced by free-form fabrication were evaluated in the human maxilla at 3 months and 7 months. Materials and Methods: HA and ZrO2 scaffolds (Phi: 3 mm) were implanted in the human maxilla, removed with surrounding bone, embedded in resin, and sectioned. A novel focused ion beam (FIB) sample preparation technique enabled the production of thin lamellae for study by scanning transmission electron microscopy. Results: Interface regions were investigated using high-angle annular dark-field imaging and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis. Interfacial apatite layers of 80 nm and 50 nm thickness were noted in the 3- and 7-month HA samples, respectively, and bone growth was discovered in micropores up to 10 mu m into the samples. Conclusions: The absence of an interfacial layer in the ZrO2 samples suggest the formation of a direct contact with bone, while HA, which bonds through an apatite layer, shows indications of resorption with increasing implantation time. This study demonstrates the potential of HA and ZrO2 scaffolds for use as bone regenerative materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据