4.7 Article

Allergen-specific IL-10-secreting type I T regulatory cells, but not CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells, are decreased in peripheral blood of patients with persistent allergic rhinitis

期刊

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 136, 期 2, 页码 292-301

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2010.03.006

关键词

Allergic rhinitis; Regulatory T cells; Peripheral tolerance

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007BAI18B15]
  2. Beijing Science and Technology Program [Z0005190041531]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30872846]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7072017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the frequencies of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) T cells and allergen-specific IL-10(+)IL-4(-), IFN-gamma+IL-4(-), IL-4(+)IFN-gamma(-)CD4(+) T cells (which display characteristics of nTreg, Tr1-, Th1- and Th2- cells, respectively) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with AR and of healthy individuals. In addition, we estimated the suppressive effect of CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells and allergen-specific, IL-10-secreting cells from both two groups. The frequency of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) T cells is similar in 43 AR patients compared with 38 healthy subjects. CD4(+)CD25(high) cells retain suppressive activity on allergen-stimulated cell proliferation and cytokine production of Th1 but not Th2 cells in both groups. However, the frequency of allergen-specific IL-10(+)IL-4(-)CD4(+) T cells is reduced in AR patients, and correlates inversely to clinical symptom scores. Allergen-specific, IL-10-secreting cells potently suppressed D. pteronyssinus major allergen 1-stimulated cell proliferation and cytokine production (IFN-gamma and IL-4) in healthy individuals. Altogether our data indicate that the number and function of CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells from allergic patients are not impaired. However, the deficiency of allergen-specific Tr1 cells may play a role in the development of AR. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据