4.7 Article

APC dysfunction is correlated with defective suppression of T cell proliferation in human type 1 diabetes

期刊

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 130, 期 3, 页码 272-279

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2008.10.005

关键词

Type 1 diabetes; Regulatory T cells; Antigen presenting cells; Suppression; Autoimmunity

资金

  1. National Institutes of health [2RO1HD37800, 4R33DK069878, 4R33HD050196, 5U24DK58778]
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International [JDRF 1-2004-661]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is widely believed that CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Treg) are defective in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and other autoimmune diseases. However, this conclusion is based on the suboptimal in vitro suppression results from very small numbers of subjects. Furthermore, the cells responsible for the suboptimal suppression have not been defined. Therefore, we carried out extensive in vitro suppression assays using both autologous and heterologous donors of Tregs, effector T cells and antigen - presenting cells (APC) from both T1D patients and normal controls. Our in vitro suppression data indicated that a significantly higher proportion (40.0%) of T1D patients have very tow suppression activity (defined as < 25%) by autologous Treg compared to controls (6.3%) (p=0.002). Meta-analysis of the published results confirmed this observation with 45.7% low suppressors in T1D and 7.8% in controls (p=0.00002). Interestingly, suppression assays using heterologous Tregs, effector T cells and APC suggest that the source of APC is correlated with the suppression activity. The frequencies of CD4(+)CD25(+) and CD4(+)CD25(hi) T cells were found to increase with age in normal controls but not in T1D patients, resulting in significantly higher frequencies of CD4(+)CD25(+) (p=0.001) and CD4(+)CD25(hi) (p=0.009) T cells in young T1D subjects than age-matched controls but slightly lower CD4(+)CD25(+) (p=0.003) and CD4(+)CD25(hi) (p=0.08) T cells in old T1D subjects than age-matched controls. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据