4.7 Article

Multiparametric Analysis of Bone Marrow in Cancer Patients Using Simultaneous PET/MR Imaging: Correlation of Fat Fraction, Diffusivity, Metabolic Activity, and Anthropometric Data

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 1048-1056

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24865

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To analyze the regional composition of bone marrow (BM) in correlation with metabolic activity and diffusivity using simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 18F-FDG-PET/MR scans of 110 patients was performed. A three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence with Dixon-based fat-water separation was used for fat quantification. Dixon images, diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and 18F-FDG-PET were co-registered. Mean values of fat fraction (FF), standardized uptake value (SUV), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of BM were measured in different anatomical regions. Correlation of FF, SUV, and ADC and association of BM fat content and metabolic activity with anthropometric data was analyzed (Pearson). BM fat content and metabolic activity was compared in patients with and without chemotherapy (t-test). Results: Regional differences in BM were found with highest fat content (93 +/- 8%) and lowest ADC (0.22 +/- 0.18 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) in the peripheral skeleton and highest SUV in the spine (1.77 +/- 0.6). There was a significant inverse correlation between FF and SUV (r=-0.73; P < 0.0001) and a significant inverse correlation between FF and ADC (r=-0.62; P < 0.0001). In patients with chemotherapy, a tendency to higher fat content and lower metabolic activity was observed in the proximal skeleton, although no statistical significance was reached. Conclusion: BM shows distinct regional variations in FF, SUV, and ADC. The inverse correlation of FF and SUV in BM suggests that BM adipose tissue does not have a comparable high metabolic activity as brown adipose tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据