4.7 Article

Automated Liver Elasticity Calculation for MR Elastography

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 1055-1063

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25072

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [EB01981]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: MR elastography (MRE) is a phase-contrast MRI technique that is used to quantitatively assess liver stiffness for staging hepatic fibrosis. The current approach requires manual selection of a region of interest (ROI) with good wave quality from which to measure stiffness. The purpose of this work was to develop and evaluate a fully automated approach for measuring hepatic stiffness from MRE images to further reduce measurement variability. Materials and Methods: An automated liver elasticity calculation (ALEC) algorithm was developed to address reader stiffness measurement variability. ALEC has three stages: initial tissue estimation, segmentation, and ROI cleanup. Stiffnesses measured by the algorithm were compared with technicians and an expert radiologist in a set of 121 clinical cases acquired at 1.5 Tesla. Intra-class correlation (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and a noninferiority test were performed to evaluate whether the algorithm can be used in place of manual analysis by technicians. Results: The stiffness measurement difference with the expert was 1.42%11.17% (mean +/- standard deviation) for the algorithm and 1.82%+/- 13.65% for the technicians. The ICCs were 0.981 and 0.984, respectively. Both the algorithm and technicians were equivalent to the expert within a 5% significance margin (P<0.01). The algorithm had no failures in the 119 cases that were considered analyzable by the human readers. Conclusion: The results of this study show that the newly developed automated algorithm is able to measure stiffness in clinical liver MRE exams with an accuracy that is equivalent to that of an expert radiologist. ALEC may be useful for analysis of archived data and suitable for performing multi-center studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据