4.3 Article

Evaluating the Current Place of Radiotherapy as Treatment Option for Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Belgium

期刊

CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 E1159-E1169

出版社

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.026

关键词

Awareness; Radiation; Survey; Underusage; Urothelial carcinoma

资金

  1. Kom op tegen Kanker (Stand up to Cancer)
  2. Flemish cancer society [0010091]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiotherapy is a potent player in the treatment of different stages of bladder cancer. Although the place of radiotherapy is recognized by international guidelines, an underusage of radiotherapy in bladder cancer is confirmed in this Belgian survey. Awareness about the place of radiotherapy in bladder cancer must be increased. Introduction: There is a gap between optimal and actual use of radiotherapy (RT) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We investigated the opinions of radiation-oncologists, urologists, and medical oncologists on use of RT in different cases. Barriers and facilitators for applying guidelines were examined. Material and Methods: A web-based survey was developed at Ghent University Hospital and conducted from November 18, 2016 to July 17, 2017. The place of primary, adjuvant, and palliative RT was evaluated. Additional questions assessed the use of guidelines, barriers, and facilitators. Results: In total, 126 physicians (57 radiation oncologists, 41 urologists, and 28 medical oncologists) completed the survey. Significant differences in use of RT in the primary and adjuvant setting were observed between radiation oncologists and urologists. Younger age and presence of hydronephrosis are perceived as contraindications for RT in the primary setting. In the adjuvant setting, RT was mainly considered in case of positive surgical margins. All radiation oncologists and 96% of medical oncologists considered palliative RT for patients with painful bone metastases, whereas 21% of urologists did not (P < .001). Clinical decisions are mainly based on EAU guidelines. The most important reason for nonadherence to guidelines is external barriers (18%). One strategy to improve awareness of guidelines is a summary of guidelines on the website of national organizations (54%). Conclusion: There is controversy regarding the place of RT in MIBC, with a clear variation between professionals. Barriers and facilitators to use RT should be addressed, seeing the gap in RT utilization and predicted increase in patients requiring RT for MIBC. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据