4.5 Article

eyeGENE®: a vision community resource facilitating patient care and paving the path for research through molecular diagnostic testing

期刊

CLINICAL GENETICS
卷 84, 期 2, 页码 190-197

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cge.12193

关键词

biorepository; clinical trials; diagnostic genotyping; eyeGENE; genetic testing; ocular genetics; patient registry

资金

  1. Department of Health and Human Services/National Institutes of Health/National Eye Institute
  2. [HHS-N-260-2007-00001-C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular genetics and genomics are revolutionizing the study and treatment of inherited eye diseases. In recognition of the impact of molecular genetics on vision and ophthalmology, the National Eye Institute established the National Ophthalmic Disease Genotyping and Phenotyping Network (eyeGENE (R)) as a multidirectional research initiative whereby a clinical component for patients diagnosed with inherited eye disease fosters research into the causes and mechanisms of these ophthalmic diseases. This is accomplished by broadening access to genetic diagnostic testing and maintaining a repository of DNA samples from clinically characterized individuals and their families to allow investigations of the causes, interventions, and management of genetic eye disorders. The eyeGENE (R) Network currently includes Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified diagnostic laboratory partners, over 270 registered clinical organizations with 500 registered users from around the United States and Canada, and is now testing approximately 100 genes representing 35 inherited eye diseases. To date, the Network has received 4400 samples from individuals with rare inherited eye diseases, which are available for access by the vision research community. eyeGENE (R) is a model partnership between the U. S. federal government, eye health care providers, CLIA-approved molecular diagnostic laboratories, private industry, and scientists who represent a broad research constituency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据