4.5 Article

Non-invasive prenatal determination of fetal sex: translating research into clinical practice

期刊

CLINICAL GENETICS
卷 80, 期 1, 页码 68-75

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01533.x

关键词

fetal sex determination; non-invasive prenatal diagnosis; sensitivity; specificity

资金

  1. European Commission for the Special Non-invasive Advances in Fetal and Neonatal Evaluation (SAFE) Network of Excellence [LSHB-CT-2004-503243]
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-0707-10107]
  3. Central and East London NIHR Comprehensive Local Research Network
  4. NHS Biomedical Research Centre
  5. National Institute for Health Research [RP-PG-0707-10107] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effectiveness and clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) for fetal sex determination using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) was assessed by undertaking a prospective national audit of UK testing. NIPD was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of the DYS14 or SRY gene in cffDNA extracted from maternal plasma. All cases referred for fetal sex determination from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2009 were ascertained from two laboratories offering the test. Fetal gender determined by NIPD was compared with that based on ultrasound, invasive test or phenotype at birth. Indication and rate of invasive testing was ascertained. In the first year, results were issued in 150/161 pregnancies tested. Of the 135 with outcome data, results were concordant in 130/135 [96.3% (95% CI 91.6-98.8%)]. Reporting criteria were changed and in the subsequent 511 pregnancies the concordancy rate increased to 401/403 [99.5% (95% CI 98.2-99.9%)]. Over the 3 years only 32.9% (174/528) underwent invasive testing. NIPD for fetal sex determination using cffDNA is highly accurate when performed in National Health Service laboratories if stringent reporting criteria are applied. Parents should be advised of the small risk of discordant results and possible need for repeat testing to resolve inconclusive results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据