4.7 Article

Low-Dose Aspirin Affects the Small Bowel Mucosa: Results of a Pilot Study With a Multidimensional Assessment

期刊

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 524-529

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. Instituto Aragones de Ciencias de la Salud and the CIBERehd (Zaragoza, Spain)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: whether low-dose aspirin (acetyl-salicylic acid [ASA]) produces intestinal damage is controversial. Our aim was to determine whether the small bowel is damaged by low-dose ASA on a short-term basis. Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers (age range, 19-64 years) underwent video capsule endoscopy (VCE), fecal calprotectin, and permeability tests (sucrose and lactulose/mannitol [lac/man] ratio) before and after ingestion of 100 mg of enteric-coated ASA daily for 14 days. Video capsule images were assessed by 2 independent expert endoscopists, fully blinded to the treatment group, by using an endoscopic scale. Results: Post-ASA VCE detected 10 cases (50%) with mucosal damage not apparent in baseline studies (6 cases had petechiae, 3 had erosions, and 1 had bleeding stigmata in 2 ulcers). The median baseline lac/man ratio (0.021; range, 0.011-0.045) increased after ASA use (0.036; range, 0.007-0.258; P = .08), and the post-ASA lac/man ratio was above the upper end of normal (>0.025) in 10 of 20 volunteers (vs baseline, P < .02). The median baseline fecal calprotectin concentration (6.05 mu g/g; range, 1.9-79.2) also increased significantly after ASA use (23.9 mu g/g; range, 3.1-75.3; P < .0005), with 3 patients having values above the cutoff (>50 mu g/g). Five of 10 subjects with abnormal findings at VCE also had lac/man ratios above the cutoff. Median baseline sucrose urinary excretion (70.0 mg; range, 11.8-151.3) increased significantly after ASA administration (107.0 mg; range, 22.9-411.3; P < .05). Conclusions: The short-term administration of low-dose ASA is associated with mucosal abnormalities of the small bowel mucosa, which might have implications in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据