4.4 Article

Characteristics of hyperparathyroid states in the Canadian multicentre osteoporosis study (CaMos) and relationship to skeletal markers

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 82, 期 3, 页码 359-368

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cen.12569

关键词

-

资金

  1. Amgen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ContextPTH is an essential regulator of mineral metabolism; PTH hypersecretion may result in hyperparathyroidism including normocalcaemic, primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism. ObjectiveTo examine the characteristics of participants with hyperparathyroid states and the relationship to bone mineral density (BMD). Design and participantsA cross-sectional study of 1872 community-dwelling men and women aged 35+ years (mostly Caucasian) with available serum PTH from Year 10 Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study follow-up (2005-07). PTH was determined using a second-generation chemiluminescence immunoassay. Outcome measuresL1-L4, femoral neck and total hip BMD. ResultsWe established a PTH reference range (27-102pmol/l) based on healthy participants (i.e. normal serum calcium, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, kidney function and body mass index, who were nonusers of antiresorptives, glucocorticoids and diuretics and not diagnosed with diabetes or thyroid disease). Participants with PTH levels in the upper reference range (56-102pmol/l), representing a prevalence of 107%, had lower femoral neck and total hip BMD, by 0030g/cm(2) [95% confidence interval: 0009; 0051] and 0025g/cm(2) (0001; 0049), respectively, than those with levels 27-56pmol/l. Participants with normocalcaemic and secondary hyperparathyroidism also had lower total hip BMD than those with levels 27-56pmol/l, and CaMos prevalences of normocalcaemic, primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism were 33%, 14% and 52%, respectively. ConclusionWe found reduced BMD in participants with accepted hyperparathyroid states but also a notable proportion of other participants that might benefit from having lower PTH levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据