4.4 Article

Novel missense mutation in the IGF-I receptor L2 domain results in intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 246-254

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04357.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Eli Lilly, Japan
  2. KAKENHI [18790718, 21591324]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21591324, 22591128, 18790718, 22780249, 21580345, 24790928] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background IGFs play key roles in intrauterine and postnatal growth through the IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR). We identified a family bearing a new heterozygous missense mutation at the L2 domain of IGF-IR (R431L). Method We analysed the nucleotide sequences of the IGF1R gene of the family. We prepared R- cells (fibroblasts with targeted disruption of the IGF-IR gene) expressing wild-type or R431L IGF-IR and performed functional analyses by evaluating IGF-I binding, IGF-I-stimulated DNA synthesis, tyrosine phosphorylation of IGF-IR and its substrates, and internalization by measuring [125I]IGF-I internalization. We also performed confocal microscopy analysis. Results We identified a family bearing a new heterozygous missense mutation at the L2 domain of IGF-IR (R431L) through an 8-year-old girl and her mother, both born with intrauterine growth retardation. In experiments conducted using cells homozygously transfected with the IGF-IR R431L mutation; (i) IGF-I binding was not affected; (ii) DNA synthesis induced by IGF-I was decreased; (iii) IGF-IR internalization stimulated by IGF-I was decreased and (iv) IGF-I-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation was reduced IGF-IR by low concentrations of IGF-I and on insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2. Conclusion A missense mutation (R431L) leads to the inhibition of cell proliferation, attenuation of IGF signalling and decrease in internalization of IGF-IR. The results of this study suggest a novel link between a mutation at the IGF-IR L2 domain and intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据