4.4 Article

Are serum TSH levels associated with oxidized low-density lipoprotein? Results from the Study of Health in Pomerania

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 76, 期 4, 页码 526-532

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04186.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Greifswald, Germany
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research [ZZ9603]
  3. Ministry of Cultural Affairs
  4. Social Ministry of the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania and Instand e.v.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Oxidized LDL (oxLDL) is involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thus, it is important to investigate putative risk factors for increased oxLDL. Evidence suggests that, compared to euthyroid individuals, LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are lower in individuals with overt hyperthyroidism. Whereas oxidization of LDL-C into oxLDL is increased in overt hyper- and hypothyroidism, it has not been investigated whether subclinical thyroid dysfunction impacts on oxLDL levels in general. We have analysed the association between serum thyrotrophin (TSH) levels and oxLDL in a population-based study. Design, Patients and Measurements Of the 4308 individuals enrolled in the Study of Health in Pomerania, data from 3519 individuals were analysed (680 missing the oxLDL variable). oxLDL was measured by the oxLDL competitive ELISA on a BEP 2000. Multivariable linear regression models were performed to assess the association between serum TSH and oxLDL levels. Results TSH was positively associated with oxLDL in a curvilinear fashion with increasing serum TSH levels. Subgroup analyses revealed a significant association only in the group of individuals > 60 years. Additionally, serum TSH levels were not associated with the ratio of oxLDL to LDL (b =-0 04; 95% CI =-0 08, 0 01; P = 0 084). Conclusions We demonstrate an association between serum TSH and oxLDL levels especially in the range of subclinical thyroid disease. Our study suggests that serum TSH levels affect LDL-C production or clearance rather than the LDL-C oxidation processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据