4.4 Article

Kisspeptin serum levels in girls with central precocious puberty

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 71, 期 4, 页码 524-528

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03575.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Objective Central precocious puberty (CPP) causes early epiphyseal maturation, and early initiation of treatment improves final height. Unfortunately, there is no one parameter that can distinguish CPP from premature thelarche (PT), which is self-limited and requires no therapy. In animal models, kisspeptin, the ligand for the G-protein coupled receptor GPR54, was found to induce precocious activation of the gonadotrophic axis. Data on kisspeptin levels in girls with precocious puberty or in healthy prepubertal girls are lacking. We measured blood kisspeptin levels in girls with CPP and evaluated its potential as a clinical marker for CPP. Design This was a case-control study. Patients Thirty-one girls clinically diagnosed with CPP and 14 prepubertal age-matched healthy controls. Measurements Kisspeptin blood levels. Results Kisspeptin levels were significantly higher in the girls with CPP than in the controls: 14 center dot 62 +/- 10 center dot 2 pmol/l vs. 8 center dot 35 +/- 2 center dot 98 pmol/l, P < 0 center dot 05. Within the CPP group, there were no significant differences between the girls with a peak LH > 5 center dot 0 IU/l and those with a peak LH < 5 center dot 0 IU/l regarding kisspeptin or any of the clinical, laboratory or ultrasound parameters, or in Tanner stage. No correlation was found between kisspeptin and body mass index standard deviation score (BMI-SDS) or height-SDS (Ht-SDS) for the entire cohort, or when analysed separately for the CPP group and the control group. Conclusions Although kisspeptin is significantly higher in girls with true CPP than in age-matched prepubertal controls, the evident overlap limits its use as a single diagnostic tool until further data obtained in larger studies should prove otherwise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据