Impact of assay design on test performance: lessons learned from 25-hydroxyvitamin D

Background: Current automated immunoassays vary significantly in many aspects of their design. This study sought to establish if the theoretical advantages and disadvantages associated with different design formats of automated 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) assays are translated into variations in assay performance in practice. Methods: 25-OHD was measured in 1236 samples using automated assays from Abbott, DiaSorin, Roche and Siemens. A subset of 362 samples had up to three liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry 25-OHD analyses performed. 25-OHD2 recovery, dilution recovery, human anti-animal antibody (HAAA) interference, 3-epi25-OHD3 cross-reactivity and precision of the automated assays were evaluated. Results: The assay that combined release of 25-OHD with analyte capture in a single step showed the most accurate 25-OHD2 recovery and the best dilution recovery. The use of vitamin D binding protein (DBP) as the capture moiety was associated with 25-OHD2 under-recovery, a trend consistent with 3-epi-25-OHD3 cross-reactivity and immunity to HAAA interference. Assays using animal-derived antibodies did not show 3-epi-25-OHD3 cross-reactivity but were variably susceptible to HAAA interference. Not combining 25-OHD release and capture in one step and use of biotin-streptavidin interaction for solid phase separation were features of the assays with inferior accuracy for diluted samples. The assays that used a backfill assay format showed the best precision at high concentrations but this design did not guarantee precision at low 25-OHD concentrations. Conclusions: Variations in design among automated 25-OHD assays influence their performance characteristics. Consideration of the details of assay design is therefore important when selecting and validating new assays.