4.6 Article

New biomarkers in diagnosis of early onset preeclampsia and imminent delivery prognosis

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
卷 52, 期 8, 页码 1159-1168

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0901

关键词

maternal outcome; neonatal outcome; placental growth factor; preeclampsia; pregnancy; soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Several studies have revealed a high soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) to placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio in preeclamptic women. However, its role in patients with suspected preeclampsia (PE) at triage in the emergency department remains an issue and a controversial unique cutpoint of 85 has been proposed regardless of gestational age. A new cutpoint for sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was investigated to rule out PE at obstetric triage, and to assess its prognostic value for risk of imminent delivery. Methods: Blood samples from 257 pregnant women with suspected PE were obtained at obstetric triage admission. Serum PlGF and sFlt-1 were measured by an electrochemoluminiscence immunoassay (ECLIA) on the immunoanalyzer Cobas e601 (Roche Diagnostics) and the corresponding ratio was calculated. Final outcomes (mainly development of PE) were reviewed and time between clinical presentation and delivery was calculated. Results: The best ratio cutpoint to diagnose PE changed according to gestational age: 23 (92.0% sensitivity, 81.1% specificity) and 45 (83.7% sensitivity, 72.6% specificity) for women <34 and >= 34 weeks' gestation, respectively. Furthermore, sFlt-1/PlGF ratio inversely correlated with time elapsed between clinical presentation and delivery, and a cutpoint of 178 could predict complications such as imminent delivery or fetal/neonatal death with a sensitivity of 70.6% and a specificity of 97.8%. Conclusions: The new cut-off values for the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio adjusted by the gestational age at clinical presentation can be used to rule out PE at obstetric triage and to predict imminent delivery with better accuracy than the cutpoint currently accepted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据