4.6 Article

Comparison of different depletion strategies for improving resolution of the human urine proteome

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 531-535

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.109

关键词

biomarkers; proteins depletion; proteomics; urine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Urine, being an ultrafiltrate of plasma, is a rich source for biomarker discovery. Since potential new disease markers are often present in low concentrations, a prefractionation/enrichment step could be useful in the discovery process. To enhance the detection of low-abundance proteins, three immuno-affinity depletion approaches were evaluated. Methods: To remove the most abundant proteins from a human urine sample, GenWay(TM) Spin IgY-12 kit, HPLC Agilent Hu-PL7 and a home-made column vs. human serum albumin [immuno-affinity column (IAC)] were compared. Quantification of total proteins, 2-D gel electrophoresis (2-DE), Progenesis gel images analysis and mass spectrometric proteins identification were applied to evaluate these strategies. Results: Reproducibility of depletion columns, by estimating protein content of unbound fractions, were: 343+/-20.0 mu g, 5.8%; 186.3+/-13.3 mu g, 7.2%; 292+/-20.6 mu g, 8.8% [mean+/-standard deviation (SD), CV%], for GenWay(TM), Agilent and IAC methods, respectively. To isolate urinary protein after depletion, ethanol precipitation provided the highest recovery (80%). Applying 2-DE and Progenesis analysis, the number of spots visualized on the gels was 468+/-21, 331+/-7, 368+/-22 and 304+/-7 (mean+/-SD) for GenWay(TM), Agilent, IAC, and the undepleted urine pool sample, respectively, with a significant difference p < 0.001 compared to the GenWay procedure. Conclusions: The sequential procedure of urine samples using multi-protein immuno-affinity depletion represents a valid tool for simplifying 2-DE analysis of the urine proteome. Particularly, the GenWay(TM) kit followed by ethanol precipitation was found to be the most efficient method for exploring the urine proteome. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:531-5.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据