4.6 Review

Rapid methods for diagnosis of bloodstream infections

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 888-908

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.157

关键词

bacteraemia; blood culture; flow cytometry; hybridisation; matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF); microarray; microbial food safety; nucleic acid-based technology (NAT); nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA); PCR; proteomic profiling; sepsis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct detection technologies for pathogenic microorganisms are emerging to be applied in the diagnosis of serious bloodstream infections and infections at sterile body sites, as well as for quality control measures prior to the release of sterile blood products and to ascertain microbial safety of food. Standard blood cultures as the current gold standard for detection of bacteraemia/sepsis and other culture-based microbiological identification procedures are comparatively slow and have limited sensitivity for fastidious or slow-growing microorganisms. Rapid nucleic acid-based technologies with PCR amplification or hybridisation probes for specific pathogens, broad-range bacterial or fungal assays, flow cytometry, as well as protein-based characterisation by mass spectrometry, aim at identification of pathogenic microorganisms within minutes to hours. Interpretation of direct detection of panbacterial or panfungal nucleic acids instead of living microorganisms in blood is complex, given the risk of contamination, the ubiquitous presence of bacterial and fungal DNA, and the lack of a gold standard. Since many of the infections at sterile sites, particularly sepsis, are medical emergencies requiring immediate therapeutic responses, rapid technologies could contribute to reduction of morbidity, mortality, and of the economic burden. This review summarises the currently available data on rapid non-culture-based technologies and outlines the potential clinical usefulness in infectious disease diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据