4.7 Article

Revision of the Troponin T Release Mechanism from Damaged Human Myocardium

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 60, 期 8, 页码 1098-1104

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.217943

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Cancer Society
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Swedish Pain Foundation (SSF)
  4. Assar Gabrielsson Cancer Research Foundation
  5. LUA/ALF funding at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) is released from damaged heart tissue in patients with acute myocardial infarction. It is presumed that most cTnT is tightly bound and released following the degradation of myofibrils in necrotic cardiomyocytes, resulting in sustained increases in circulating cTnT. Evidence of a large irreversibly bound fraction is based on the inability to extract most cTnT from cardiac tissue in cold low-salt extraction buffers. METHODS: Here we examined in vitro extraction of cTnT from human cardiac tissue in serum at 37 degrees C. RESULTS: We found that over 80% of the cTnT can be extracted from human cardiac tissue in 90 min using large volumes of human serum at 37 degrees C. The release ratio was highly dependent on the extraction volume and was only 3% if an equal volume of serum and heart tissue was used. In contrast, extraction of the cytoplasmic cardiac damage markers myoglobin and creatinine kinase was much less affected by changing these conditions. Purified cTnT was poorly soluble in a low-salt extraction buffer at 0 degrees C, previously used to define the free cTnT fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the diffusible fraction of cTnT is likely substantially larger in vivo than previously reported and likely is not fixed but dependent on local plasma flow. It is therefore possible that the sustained increase in circulating cTnT after myocardial infarction is at least in part due to a slow washout of cTnT that interacts reversibly with tropomyosin in myofibrils. (C) 2014 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据