4.7 Article

Automated 22-kD Growth Hormone-Specific Assay without Interference from Pegyisomant

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 58, 期 10, 页码 1446-1456

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.188128

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pfizer
  2. IDS
  3. Siemens
  4. Diasorin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Large variability exists among different growth hormone (GH) assays owing to differences in calibration, antibody specificity, isoform recognition, and interference from GH binding protein (GHBP). The GH receptor antagonist Pegvisomant presents a new challenge because Pegvisomant interferes with many GH assays. A recent consensus conference established criteria for standardization and evaluation of GH assays. Following consensus recommendations, we developed a new GH assay on an automated analyzer (IDS-iSYS, Immunodiagnostic Systems). METHODS: A monoclonal antibody not cross-reacting with Pegvisomant was combined with a monoclonal antibody specific for 22-kD GH. Isoform specificity and interference from GHBP was tested and compared to that seen in 2 existing automated GH assays (Siemens Immulite, Diasorin Liaison). We also compared GH concentrations measured by the 3 assays for healthy volunteers and patients with acromegaly receiving different treatments. Using the iSYS assay, we also established nadir GH values during oral glucose load and analyzed changes in endogenous GH during Pegvisomant treatment. RESULTS: Analytical and functional sensitivities were 0.01 mu g/L and 0.04 mu g/L, with a dynamic range from 0.04 to 100 mu g/L. Intraassay CVs were 2%-4%, whereas interassay CVs were 5%-7% at GH concentrations between 1.7 and 27.5 mu g/L. The assay was specific for 22-kD GH and not affected by GHBP. The presence of Pegvisomant, which leads to a negative bias on the Immulite and dramatic overestimation of GH on the Liaison, had no impact on the iSYS GH assay. CONCLUSIONS: The new assay fulfils recent consensus recommendations and presents a useful new tool for reliable measurement of GH. (C) 2012 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据