4.6 Article

Inflammatory remodeling of the HDL proteome impairs cholesterol efflux capacity

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 56, 期 8, 页码 1519-1530

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M059089

关键词

atherosclerosis; apolipoproteins; high density lipoprotein; inflammation; mass spectrometry; proteomics

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL112625, HL108897, DK035816, DK002456, HL086798, HL089504]
  2. American Heart Association [0830231N]
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL112625, R01HL108897, R01HL086798, R01HL089504, P01HL092969] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK017047, P30DK035816, P01DK002456] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies demonstrate that HDL's ability to promote cholesterol efflux from macrophages associates strongly with cardioprotection in humans independently of HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and apoA-I, HDL's major protein. However, the mechanisms that impair cholesterol efflux capacity during vascular disease are unclear. Inflammation, a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular disease, has been shown to impair HDL's cholesterol efflux capacity. We therefore tested the hypothesis that HDL's impaired efflux capacity is mediated by specific changes of its protein cargo. Humans with acute inflammation induced by low-level endotoxin had unchanged HDL-C levels, but their HDL-C efflux capacity was significantly impaired. Proteomic analyses demonstrated that HDL's cholesterol efflux capacity correlated inversely with HDL content of serum amyloid A (SAA) 1 and SAA2. In mice, acute inflammation caused a marked impairment of HDL-C efflux capacity that correlated with a large increase in HDL SAA. In striking contrast, the efflux capacity of mouse inflammatory HDL was preserved with genetic ablation of SAA1 and SAA2.Jlr Our observations indicate that the inflammatory impairment of HDL-C efflux capacity is due in part to SAA-mediated remodeling of HDL's protein cargo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据