4.7 Article

PIK3CA Mutational Status in Circulating Tumor Cells Can Change During Disease Recurrence or Progression in Patients with Breast Cancer

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 22, 页码 5823-5834

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0149

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTC) is crucial for the investigation of molecular-targeted therapies while PIK3CA somatic mutations play a crucial role in therapy response. We investigated the presence of PIK3CA mutations in CTC and whether this is associated with clinical outcome. Experimental Design: We developed and validated an ultrasensitive methodology for the detection of PIK3CA mutations that is based on a combination of allele-specific, asymmetric rapid PCR and melting analysis. We analyzed PIK3CA hotspot mutations in: (i) a training group consisting of EpCAM-positive CTC fraction from 37 patients with clinically confirmed metastasis, and 26 healthy female volunteers and 15 primary breast tumor tissues and (ii) an independent group consisting of EpCAM-positive CTC fraction from 57 metastatic and 118 operable breast cancer patients and 76 corresponding primary tumors. Results: The assay could detect 0.05% of mutated dsDNA in the presence of 99.95% wtDNA for both exons (9 and 20) and was highly specific (0/26 healthy donors). PIK3CA mutations were identified in EpCAM-positive CTC in 20 of 57(35.1%) and in 23 of 118 (19.5%) patients with metastatic and operable breast cancer, and in 45 of 76(59.2%) corresponding FFPEs. Our data indicate that PIK3CA mutational status in CTCs can change during disease progression and is associated with worse survival (P = 0.047). Conclusions: PIK3CA hotspot mutations are present at a relatively high frequency in CTCs and their presence is associated with worse survival in patients with breast cancer with metastasis. Evaluation of PIK3CA mutational status in CTCs is a strategy with potential clinical application. (C) 2014 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据