4.7 Article

Phase I Safety and Pharmacodynamic of Inecalcitol, a Novel VDR Agonist with Docetaxel in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 17, 页码 4471-4477

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3247

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Hybrigenics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We conducted a phase I multicenter trial in naive metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients with escalating inecalcitol dosages, combined with docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Inecalcitol is a novel vitamin D receptor agonist with higher antiproliferative effects and a 100-fold lower hypercalcemic activity than calcitriol. Experimental Design: Safety and efficacy were evaluated in groups of three to six patients receiving inecalcitol during a 21-day cycle in combination with docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) and oral prednisone (5 mg twice a day) up to six cycles. Primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as grade 3 hypercalcemia within the first cycle. Efficacy endpoint was >= 30% PSA decline within 3 months. Results: Eight dose levels (40-8,000 mu g) were evaluated in 54 patients. DLT occurred in two of four patients receiving 8,000 mu g/day after one and two weeks of inecalcitol. Calcemia normalized a few days after interruption of inecalcitol. Two other patients reached grade 2, and the dose level was reduced to 4,000 mu g. After dose reduction, calcemia remained within normal range and grade 1 hypercalcemia. The maximum tolerated dose was 4,000 mu g daily. Respectively, 85% and 76% of the patients had >= 30% PSA decline within 3 months and >= 50% PSA decline at any time during the study. Median time to PSA progression was 169 days. Conclusion: High antiproliferative daily inecalcitol dose has been safely used in combination with docetaxel and shows encouraging PSA response (>= 30% PSA response: 85%; >= 50% PSA response: 76%). A randomized phase II study is planned. (C) 2014 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据