4.7 Article

Meta-analysis for the Association between Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 295-302

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1779

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a relatively rare tumor that is treated with targeted therapies in advanced stages. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) often require long followup and large sample sizes to evaluate overall survival (OS), the gold-standard measure of treatment efficacy. However, changes in therapy following disease progression may complicate survival assessments. Establishing surrogate endpoints may facilitate the drug approval and availability of new efficacious treatments; however, no published studies have investigated this topic in unresectable and/ or metastatic GIST. Experimental Design: A systematic literature review identified 14 RCTs and five observational studies of sufficient methodologic quality published between January 1995 and December 2013 (29 treatment arms; 2,189 patients). Weighted linear regression was used to evaluate the relation between median OS and median progression-free survival (PFS) for all arms combined and stratified by treatment line, treatment type, and quality score. Results: Median OS and PFS were positively related with a correlation of 0.91. The association was still moderate (correlation 0.72) after eliminating four influential data points. In stratified analyses, correlation of OS and PFS was greater in later lines of therapy (first line 1/4 0.52; second line 1/4 0.80; third-and laterline 1/4 0.70) and imatinib showed a stronger association (0.91) than other evaluated treatments ( 0.26 to 0.69). Conclusion: This analysis identified a strong relationship between median OS and PFS, especially in later lines of therapy. Findings suggest that PFS could serve as a surrogate marker for OS; however, analyses of patient-level data are needed to establish its validity in GIST. (C) 2014 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据