4.7 Article

COX-2-Independent Effects of Celecoxib Sensitize Lymphoma B Cells to TRAIL-Mediated Apoptosis

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 2663-2673

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2305

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Association pour le Developpement de l'Hemato-Oncologie (ADHO)
  2. Ligue contre le cancer
  3. INSERM
  4. Region Bretagne
  5. Universite de Rennes 1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Despite therapeutic advances, non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) remain incurable. They form a group of neoplasms strongly dependent on their inflammatory microenvironment, which plays an important supportive role in tumor B-cell survival and in the resistance to antitumor immune response. New therapies must consider both tumor cells and their surrounding microenvironment Experimental Design: Stromal cells, derived from bone marrow or lymph nodes, and B cells from follicular lymphoma patients were cocultured or cultured alone with celecoxib treatment, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and/or TRAIL, a promising cytotoxic molecule for cancer therapy. Results: In this study, we show that follicular lymphoma stromal cells produce large amounts of PGE(2). This production is abrogated after celecoxib treatment, targeting the COX-2 isoenzyme involved in PGE(2) synthesis. Furthermore, we demonstrate that celecoxib increases apoptosis in NHL B-cell lines and in primary follicular lymphoma B cells cocultured with stromal cells, but independently of the PGE(2)/COX-2 axis. Finally, celecoxib increases the apoptotic activity of TRAIL. We provide evidence that celecoxib affects proliferation and sensitizes NHL B-cell lines to apoptosis through COX-2-independent effects by slowing down the cell cycle and decreasing the expression of survival proteins, such as Mcl-1. Conclusions: These data suggest new potent strategies for NHL therapy combining drugs targeting both tumor B cells and survival signals provided by the tumor microenvironment. (C) 2014 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据