4.7 Article

LOH in the HLA Class I Region at 6p21 Is Associated with Shorter Survival in Newly Diagnosed Adult Glioblastoma

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 1816-1826

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2861

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Doris Duke Clinical Research Fellowship
  2. Musella Foundation for Brain Tumor Research and Information
  3. NIH [2R01 NS055140, 1P01 CA132714, P30CA047904]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24790353] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Glioblastoma (GBM) shows downregulated expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I, thereby escaping from cytotoxic T cells and limiting the efficacy of immunotherapy. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of HLA class I (6p21) and/or beta-2 microglobulin (B2m) (15q21) regions represents irreversible downregulation. In this study, we examined the prevalence of these LOH events and their relations with overall survival in GBM. Experimental Design: In a cross-sectional analysis on 60 adult patients with GBM, DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens were evaluated for 10 microsatellite regions of HLA class I, B2m, HLA class II, HLA class III, and 6q by PCR as well as immunohistochemical evaluation of HLA class I expression and CD8(+) T-cell infiltration. Results: LOH in HLA class I, B2m, HLA class II, HLA class III, and 6q regions was present in 41.4%, 18.2%, 9.4%, 77.8%, and 36.0% of informative cases, respectively. LOH of HLA class I was associated with shorter overall survival (HR = 4.89, P = 0.0078). HLA class I was downregulated in 22% to 43% of cases based on immunohistochemistry. Cases that displayed negative staining were significantly younger. HLA class I expression correlated with intratumoral CD8(+) T-cell infiltration. Conclusion: LOH in the HLA class I region is frequent in adult GBMs. The association of shorter survival with LOH in this region suggests a crucial role for these genes in immunosurveillance. Clin Cancer Res; 19(7); 1816-26. (C)2013 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据