4.7 Article

Phase I Study of Panobinostat plus Everolimus in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 24, 页码 6882-6890

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1906

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Lymphoma SPORE
  2. Young Texans Against Cancer Fund
  3. Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of panobinostat plus everolimus in patients with relapsed Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The concept was supported by the single-agent clinical activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors, and on the in vitro mechanism-based synergistic antiproliferative activity. Experimental Design: This was a phase I study in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma using panobinostat orally on Monday/Wednesday/Friday and everolimus orally daily. Toxicity and responses were assessed in dose-escalation cohort followed by expansion cohort at maximum-tolerated dose. Exploratory analysis of serum cytokine levels was performed. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled onto four dose levels. The dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia. The maximal tolerated dose was panobinostat 20 mg and everolimus 10 mg. Grade 3/4 toxicity included thrombocytopenia (64%), neutropenia (47%), anemia (20%), infection (10%), fatigue (7%), and dyspnea (7%). A total of 10 patients (33%; indolent lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma) achieved objective responses. In patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 14), the overall response rate was 43% with complete response rate of 15%. In patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple serum cytokine levels decreased significantly after treatment with this combination therapy. Of note, clinical responses were associated with a decrease in serum interleukin-5 levels (day 8, P = 0.013, and day 15, P = 0.021). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the combination therapy is active but with significant thrombocytopenia. Future studies should explore alternate scheduling and different compounds that target the same pathways to improve the tolerability of this novel combination. (C)2013 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据