4.7 Article

Concurrent Temozolomide and Dose-Escalated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 273-279

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2073

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [PO1 CA59827, PO1 CA87634, PO1 CA85878]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of radiation (RT) with concurrent temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), to estimate their progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and to assess the role of C-11 methionine PET (MET-PET) imaging in predicting recurrence. Experimental Design: Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) doses of 66 to 81 Gy, assigned to patients by the time-to-event continual reassessment method, were delivered over 6 weeks with concurrent daily temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)) followed by adjuvant cyclic temozolomide (200 mg/m(2) d1-5 q28d x 6 cycles). Treatment was based on gadolinium-enhanced MRI. Pretreatment MET-PET scans were obtained for correlation with eventual sites of failure. Results: A total of 38 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 54 months for patients who remain alive. Late CNS grade >= III toxicity was observed at 78 (2 of 7 patients) and 81 Gy (1 of 9 patients). None of 22 patients receiving 75 or less Gy developed RT necrosis. Median OS and PFS were 20.1 (14.0-32.5) and 9.0 (6.0-11.7) months, respectively. Twenty-two of 32 patients with pretreatment MET-PET uptake showed uptake beyond the contrast-enhanced MRI. Patients whose treatment did not include the region of increased MET-PET uptake showed an increased risk of noncentral failure (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with GBM can safely receive standard temozolomide with 75 Gy in 30 fractions, delivered using IMRT. The median OS of 20.1 months is promising. Furthermore, MET-PET appears to predict regions of high risk of recurrence not defined by MRI, suggesting that further improvements may be possible by targeting metabolically active regions. Clin Cancer Res; 18(1); 273-9. (C)2011 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据