4.7 Article

Determinants of Successful CD8+ T-Cell Adoptive Immunotherapy for Large Established Tumors in Mice

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 16, 页码 5343-5352

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0503

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI, Center for Cancer Research, NIH, Bethesda, MD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) of tumor infiltrating or genetically engineered T cells can cause durable responses in patients with metastatic cancer. Multiple clinically modifiable parameters can comprise this therapy, including cell dose and phenotype, in vivo antigen restimulation, and common gamma-chain (gamma(c)) cytokine support. However, the relative contributions of each these individual components to the magnitude of the antitumor response have yet to be quantified. Experimental Design: To systematically and quantitatively appraise each of these variables, we employed the Pmel-1 mouse model treating large, established B16 melanoma tumors. In addition to cell dose and magnitude of in vivo antigen restimulation, we also evaluated the relative efficacy of central memory (T(CM)), effector memory (T(EM)), and stem cell memory (T(SCM)) subsets on the strength of tumor regression as well as the dose and type of clinically available gamma(c) cytokines, including IL-2, IL-7, IL-15, and IL-21. Results: We found that cell dose, T-cell differentiation status, and viral vaccine titer each were correlated strongly and significantly with the magnitude of tumor regression. Surprisingly, although the total number of IL-2 doses was correlated with tumor regression, no significant benefit to prolonged (>= 6 doses) administration was observed. Moreover, the specific type and dose of gamma(c) cytokine only moderately correlated with response. Conclusion: Collectively, these findings elucidate some of the key determinants of successful ACT immunotherapy for the treatment of cancer in mice and further show that gamma(c) cytokines offer a similar ability to effectively drive antitumor T-cell function in vivo. Clin Cancer Res; 17(16); 5343-52. (C)2011 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据