4.7 Article

EpCAM/CD3-Bispecific T-cell Engaging Antibody MT110 Eliminates Primary Human Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 465-474

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1270

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Micromet Inc.
  2. ERC [Pa-CSC 233460]
  3. Sub-direccion General de Evaluacion y Fomento de la Investigacion, Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [PS09/02129]
  4. Programa Nacional de Internacionalizacion de la I+D, Subprograma: FCCI [PLE2009-0105]
  5. La Caixa Predoctoral Fellowship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Tumor-initiating cells with stem-like properties, also termed cancer stem cells (CSC), have been shown to sustain tumor growth as well as metastasis and are highly resistant to chemotherapy. Because pancreatic CSCs have been isolated on the basis of EpCAM expression, we investigated whether a targeted immunotherapy to EpCAM using the bispecific T-cell-engaging antibody MT110 is capable of eradicating CSCs. Experimental Design: We studied in vitro and in vivo the effects of MT110 on CSCs using both established cell lines as well as primary cells of human pancreatic cancer. Results: Although established cell lines were more responsive to MT110-engaged T cells, also primary cells showed a time-and dose-dependent response to treatment with the bispecific antibody. In addition, the population of highly tumorigenic CSCs was efficiently targeted by the EpCAM/CD3-bispecific antibody MT110 in vitro and in vivo using a mouse model of established primary pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer cells derived from metastases were slightly more resistant to MT110 treatment on the basis of in vivo tumorigenicity studies. This appeared to be related to a higher frequency of an EpCAM-negative subpopulation of CSCs. Conclusions: Cytotoxic T cells can be effectively redirected against primary human pancreatic cancer cells by T-cell-engaging BiTE antibody MT110 including a subpopulation of highly tumorigenic CSCs. Clin Cancer Res; 18(2); 465-74. (C) 2011 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据