4.7 Article

Differentiation Therapy Exerts Antitumor Effects on Stem-like Glioma Cells

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 2715-2728

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1800

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Sibylle Assmus Foundation
  2. Helmholtz Society [NT-GE-016+062]
  3. Verein zur Forderung der Krebsforschung
  4. Heinz Goetze Memorial Fellowship Program
  5. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [01GS0886]
  6. Tumorzentrum Heidelberg/Mannheim

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Stem-like tumor cells comprise a highly tumorigenic and therapy-resistant tumor subpopulation, which is believed to substantially influence tumor initiation and therapy resistance in glioma. Currently, therapeutic, drug-induced differentiation is considered as a promising approach to eradicate this tumor-driving cell population; retinoic acid is well known as a potent modulator of differentiation and proliferation in normal stem cells. In glioma, knowledge about the efficacy of retinoic acid-induced differentiation to target the stem-like tumor cell pool could have therapeutic implications. Experimental Design: Stem-like glioma cells (SLGC) were differentiated with all-trans retinoic acid-containing medium to study the effect of differentiation on angiogenesis, invasive growth, as well as radioresistance and chemoresistance of SLGCs. In vivo effects were studied using live microscopy in a cranial window model. Results: Our data suggest that in vitro differentiation of SLGCs induces therapy-sensitizing effects, impairs the secretion of angiogenic cytokines, and disrupts SLGCs motility. Further, ex vivo differentiation reduces tumorigenicity of SLGCs. Finally, we show that all-trans retinoic acid treatment alone can induce antitumor effects in vivo. Conclusions: Altogether, these results highlight the potential of differentiation treatment to target the stem-like cell population in glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res; 16(10); 2715-28. (C) 2010 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据