4.7 Article

Highly Phosphorylated FOXO3A Is an Adverse Prognostic Factor in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 1865-1874

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2551

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA108631] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The Forkhead transcription factors (FOXO) are tumor suppressor genes regulating differentiation, metabolism, and apoptosis that functionally interact with signal transduction pathways shown to be deregulated and prognostic in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). This study evaluated the level of expression and the prognostic relevance of total and phosphorylated FOXO3A protein in AML. Experimental Design: We used reverse-phase protein array methods to measure the level of total and phosphoprotein expression of FOXO3A, in leukemia-enriched protein samples from 511 newly diagnosed AML patients. Results: The expression range was similar to normal CD34+ cells and similar in blood and marrow. Levels of total FOXO3A were higher at relapse compared with diagnosis. Levels of pFOXO3A or the ratio of phospho to total (PT) were not associated with karyotpe but were higher in patients with FLT3 mutations. Higher levels of pFOXO3A or PT-FOXO3A were associated with increased proliferation evidenced by strong correlation with higher WBC, percent marrow, and blood blasts and by correlation with higher levels of Cyclins B1, D1 and D3, pGSK3, pMTOR, and pStat5. Patients with High levels of pFOXO3A or PT-FOXO3A had higher rates of primary resistance and shorter remission durations, which combine to cause an inferior survival experience (P = 0.0002). This effect was independent of cytogenetics. PT-FOXO3A was a statistically significant independent predictor in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: High levels of phosphorylation of FOXO3A is a therapeutically targetable, independent adverse prognostic factor in AML. Clin Cancer Res; 16(6); 1865-74. (C) 2010 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据