4.7 Article

Dual Degradation of Aurora A and B Kinases by the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor LBH589 Induces G2-M Arrest and Apoptosis of Renal Cancer Cells

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 840-850

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1918

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study is aimed at investigating antineoplastic efficacy of histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI) LBH589 on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and elucidating the novel molecular mechanisms involved in growth arrest and apoptosis by targeting the important nonhistone molecules. Experimental Design: We analyzed the growth-inhibitory effect of LBH589 on RCC by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay in vitro and antitumor efficacy by xenograft experiments in vivo. To verify the associated molecular mechanisms involved in LBH589-mediated cell death and cell cycle progression by Western blotting and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. Results: HDACI LBH589 induced degradation of both Aurora A and B kinases through a proteasome-mediated pathway by targeting HDAC3 and HDAC6. The dual degradation of Aurora A and B kinases mediated by LBH589 resulted in inducing G(2)-M arrest and apoptosis of renal cancer cell lines and our results also showed that LBH589 potently inhibited renal cancer cell growth in vitro and suppressed tumor formation in vivo. The Aurora A and B kinases and HDAC3 are overexpressed in the human RCC tumor tissues examined, which make them perfect targets for HDACI LBH589 treatment. Conclusions: Our in vitro and in vivo data showed that LBH589 has potent anticancer effect of renal cancer cells. LBH589 and other HDACI treatment resulted in inducing G(2)-M arrest and apoptosis of renal cancer cells through degradation of Aurora A and B kinases by inhibition of HDAC3 and HDAC6. The clinical efficacy of LBH589 in the treatment of patients with metastatic RCC, especially those with high Aurora kinase and HDAC expression, is worthy of further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据