4.7 Article

A Phase I Trial of Enzastaurin in Patients with Recurrent Gliomas

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 3617-3623

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3071

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Eli Lilly
  2. Company Cooperative Research and Development Agreement [01364]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Enzastaurin is a selective inhibitor of protein kinase C beta. Prior phase I studies did not show increased drug exposures with escalating once daily administration. Limits from gastrointestinal absorption may be overcome by twice daily dosing, potentially improving antitumor effects. Experimental Design: We conducted a phase I dose escalation study in 26 patients with recurrent malignant glioma, stratified by use of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, to investigate whether divided twice daily dosing results in higher exposures compared with once daily dosing. Phosphorylated glycogen synthase 3 beta was analyzed as a potential biomarker of enzastaurin activity. Results: Enzastaurin was poorly tolerated at all dose levels evaluated (500, 800, and 1,000 mg total daily), with thrombocytopenia and prolonged QTc as dose-limiting toxicities. The average drug concentration of enzastaurin under steady-state conditions was doubled by twice daily dosing compared with daily dosing [1.990; 90% confidence interval (CI), 1.450-2.730]. Additionally, geometric mean ratios doubled with 800 versus 500 mg dosing for both daily (2.687; 90% CI, 1.232-5.860) and twice daily regimens (1.852; 90% CI, 0.799-4.292). Two patients achieved long-term benefit (over 150 weeks progression free). Conclusions: Higher and more frequent dosing of enzastaurin resulted in improved drug exposure but with unacceptable toxicity at the doses tested. Phosphorylated glycogen synthase 3 beta may be a useful biomarker of the biological activity of enzastaurin. Enzastaurin has activity in a subset of malignant glioma patients and warrants continued study in combination with other agents using a maximal once daily dose of 500 mg.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据