4.7 Article

Loss of VHL and Hypoxia Provokes PAX2 Up-Regulation in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 3297-3304

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2779

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. UBS AG
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [3238BO-103145]
  3. Zurich Cancer League, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The paired box gene 2, PAX2, encodes for a transcription factor that is up-regulated during nephrogenesis and becomes silenced in mature epithelium of the glomeruli, the proximal, and distal tubules. Reactivation of PAX2 has been frequently observed in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), a tumor type characterized by loss of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor function. The regulation of PAX2 expression in ccRCC is unknown. Experimental Design: We applied reporter gene assays to investigate PAX2 promoter regulation. Furthermore, PAX2 expression was determined in ccRCC cell lines under normoxic and hypoxic condition in a VHL wild-type and mutated background. PAX2 expression was also assessed in 831 human ccRCC and correlated with hypoxia-inducible factor a (HIF alpha) and clinical parameters. Results: Here, we show that both loss of VHL protein (pVHL) function and hypoxia leads to strong PAX2 reexpression. Using luciferase reporter gene assays, no induction was obtained in spite of six hypoxia response element motifs identified in the promoter of PAX2. Comprehensive immunohistochemical analyses showed significant correlations between PAX2, HIF1 alpha, and HIF2 alpha-target CCND1 expression patterns in ccRCC patients. Notably, PAX2 expression was highly associated with early-stage, well-differentiated ccRCC and, consequently, better clinical outcome (P < 0.0001 each). Additional analyses indicated that PAX2 repressor WT1 and cancer-linked hypomethylation are not important for transcriptional regulation of PAX2 in ccRCC. Conclusion: We conclude that in ccRCC, PAX2 reactivation is driven by HIF-dependent mechanisms following pVHL loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据