4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Axl and growth arrest - Specific gene 6 are frequently overexpressed in human gliomas and predict poor prognosis in patients with glioblastoma multiforme

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 130-138

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0862

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose:The receptor tyrosine kinase Axl has recently been identified as a critical element in the invasive properties of glioma cell lines. However, the effect of Axl and its ligand growth arrest specific gene 6 (Gas6) in human gliomas is still unknown. Experimental Design: Axl and Gas6 expression was studied in 42 fresh-frozen and 79 paraffin-embedded glioma specimens by means of reverse transcription-PCR and immunohistochemistry. The prognostic value of AxI and Gas6 expression was evaluated using a population-based tissue microarray derived from a cohort of 55 glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. Results: Axl and Gas6 were detectable in gliomas of malignancy gradesWHO 2 to 4. Moderate to high AxI m RNA expression was found in 61%, Axl protein in 55%, Gas6 mRNA in 81%, and Gas6 protein in 74% of GBM samples, respectively. GBM patients with high AxI expression and Axl/Gas6 coexpression showed a significantly shorter time to tumor progression and an association with poorer overall survival. Comparative immunohistochemical studies showed that AxI staining was most pronounced in glioma cells of pseuclopalisades and reactive astrocytes. Additionally, Axl/ Gas6 coexpression was observed in glioma cells and tumor vessels. In contrast, AxI staining was not detectable in nonneoplastic brain tissue and Gas6 was strongly expressed in neurons. Conclusions: In human gliomas, Axl and Gas6 are frequently overexpressed in both glioma and vascular cells and predict poor prognosis in GBM patients. Our results indicate that specific targeting of the Axl/Gas6 signaling pathway may represent a potential new approach for glioma treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据