4.7 Article

Genetic clustering of clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on array-comparative genomic hybridization: Its association with DNA methylation alteration and patient outcome

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 17, 页码 5531-5539

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0443

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose:The aim of this study was to clarify genetic and epigenetic alterations occurring during renal carcinogenesis. Experimental Design: Copy number alterations were examined by array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis using an array harboring 4,361 bacterial artificial chromosome clones, and DNA methylation alterations on CpG islands of the p16 human MutL homologue I von Hippel-Lindau, and thrombospondin 1 genes and the methylated in tumor (MINT-11, MINT-2, MINT-112, MINT-25, and MINT-31) clones were examined in 51 clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Results: By unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis based on copy number alterations, clear cell RCCs were clustered into the two subclasses, clusters A (n = 34) and B (n = 17). Copy number alterations were accumulated in cluster B. Loss of chromosome 3p and gain of 5q and 7 were frequent in both clusters A and B, whereas loss of 1p, 4, 9,13q, and 14q was frequent only in cluster B. The average number of methylated CpG islands in cluster B was significantly higher than those in clusterA. Clear cell RCCs showing higher histologic grades, vascular involvement, renal vein tumor thrombi, and higher pathologic stages were accumulated in cluster B. The recurrence-free and overall survival rates of patients in cluster B were significantly lower than those of patients in cluster A. Multivariate analysis revealed that genetic clustering was a predictor of recurrence-free survival and was independent of histologic grade and pathologic stage. Conclusions: This genetic clustering of clear cell RCC is significantly associated with regional DNA hypermethylation and may become a prognostic indicator for patients with RCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据