4.7 Article

Disrupted expression of CXCL5 in colorectal cancer is associated with rapid tumor formation in rats and poor prognosis in patients

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 2276-2284

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4045

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We isolated a subline (CC531M) from the CC531S rat colon carcinoma cell line, which grows and metastasizes much more rapidly than CC531S. We found, using RNA expression profiling, that one of the major changes in the CC531M cell line was a 5.8-fold reduction of the chemokine CXCL5. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of CXCL5 expression on colorectal tumor growth and metastasis. Experimental Design: CC531 clones were generated with either knockdown or restored expression of CXCL5. These clones were inoculated in the liver of rats. In addition, in two independent cohorts of colorectal cancer patients, the level of CXCL5 expression was determined and associated to clinical variables. Results: Knockdown of CXCL5 expression in CC531S resulted in rapid tumor growth and increased number of metastasis, whereas restored expression of CXCL5 in CC531M resulted in a return of the mild tumor growth pattern of the parental cell line CC531S. In vitro, no difference was found in proliferation rate between clones with either high or low expression of CXCL5, suggesting that environmental interactions directed by CXCL5 determine tumor outgrowth. Finally, the importance of our findings was established for patients with colorectal cancer. We found that low expression of CXCL5 was significantly associated with poor prognosis for colorectal cancer patients. CXCL5 showed a trend (P = 0.05) for a positive correlation with intraturnoral CD8(+) T-cell infiltration, suggesting a possible explanation for the observed poorer prognosis. Conclusions: Our results show that CXCL5 is important in growth and development of colorectal cancer, implicating a future role in both cancer therapy and diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据