4.7 Article

Radiosensitizing Effect of YM155, a Novel Small-Molecule Survivin Suppressant, in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Lines

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 20, 页码 6496-6504

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0468

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Survivin, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family, is an attractive target for cancer therapy. We have now investigated the effect of YM155, a small-molecule inhibitor of survivin expression, on the sensitivity of human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines to gamma-radiation. Experimental Design: The radiosensitizing effect of YM155 was evaluated on the basis of cell death, clonogenic survival, and progression of tumor xenografts. Radiation-induced DNA damage was evaluated on the basis of histone H2AX phosphorylation and foci formation. Results: YM155 induced down-regulation of survivin expression in NSCLC cells in a concentration-and time-dependent manner. A clonogenic survival assay revealed that YM155 increased the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to gamma-radiation in vitro. The combination of YM155 and gamma-radiation induced synergistic increases both in the number of apoptotic cells and in the activity of caspase-3. Immunof luorescence analysis of histone gamma-H2AX also showed that YM155 delayed the repair of radiation-induced double-strand breaks in nuclear DNA. Finally, combination therapy with YM155 and gamma-radiation delayed the growth of NSCLC tumor xenografts in nude mice to a greater extent than did either treatment modality alone. Conclusions: These results suggest that YM155 sensitizes NSCLC cells to radiation both in vitro and in vivo, and that this effect of YM155 is likely attributable, at least in part, to the inhibition of DNA repair and enhancement of apoptosis that result from the down-regulation of survivin expression. Combined treatment with YM155 and radiation warrants investigation in clinical trials as a potential anticancer strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据